Header graphics: Save Stonehenge!
For the latest campaign news, please check out the Stonehenge Alliance website

You are here: Home > Information > Issues > Ecological impacts

Ecological impacts

The Stonehenge scheme would not just have archaeological and transport impacts; there would be a number of significant ecological impacts on habitats of international importance:

SSSIs are protected by UK legislation. SACs and cSACs are protected by the European Habitats Directive (and its UK-law implementation, the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations, 1994) for their international importance to biodiversity.

Newbury bypass campaigners set up a detailed scientific monitoring programme to study the effects of "runoff" (polluted water draining from the road into rivers and groundwater). This confirms that, even with "best-practice"pollution controls, toxic pollution does occur. Similar pollution would almost certainly affect the Till and Avon rivers if the Stonehenge scheme went ahead.

Mott Macdonald, the company now designing the Stonehenge scheme, also designed the notoriously damaging Twyford Down and Newbury schemes -- with their particularly badly designed river crossings. In fairness, I feel obliged to point out that the Newbury bypass did win an award... from the Concrete Society.